```
$ ./run_electrum --testnet signmessage -w /home/user/.electrum/testnet/wallets/test_trezor_white_bip84 tb1q5pguna9y2g9y2gsu8r8gmxeye2cefvyly8dg02 heyheyhey -o
0.84 | W | plugins.jade.jadepy.jade | No module named 'electrum.plugins.jade.jadepy.jade_ble'
0.84 | W | plugins.jade.jadepy.jade | BLE scanning/connectivity will not be available
3.73 | E | __main__ | error running command (without daemon)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugins/trezor/clientbase.py", line 151, in get_xpub
node = trezorlib.btc.get_public_node(self.client, address_n).node
File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/trezorlib/tools.py", line 274, in wrapped_f
ret = f(*args, **kwargs)
File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/trezorlib/btc.py", line 125, in get_public_node
return client.call(
File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/trezorlib/tools.py", line 297, in wrapped_f
return f(client, *args, **kwargs)
File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/trezorlib/client.py", line 260, in call
resp = self._callback_pin(resp)
File "/home/user/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/trezorlib/client.py", line 186, in _callback_pin
pin = self.ui.get_pin(msg.type)
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugins/trezor/clientbase.py", line 308, in get_pin
pin = self.handler.get_pin(msg.format(self.device), show_strength=show_strength)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_pin'
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/./run_electrum", line 540, in handle_cmd
result = fut.result()
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 458, in result
return self.__get_result()
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 403, in __get_result
raise self._exception
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/./run_electrum", line 227, in run_offline_command
password = get_password_for_hw_device_encrypted_storage(plugins)
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/./run_electrum", line 212, in get_password_for_hw_device_encrypted_storage
return client.get_password_for_storage_encryption()
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugin.py", line 523, in wrapper
return run_in_hwd_thread(partial(func, *args, **kwargs))
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugin.py", line 516, in run_in_hwd_thread
return fut.result()
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 458, in result
return self.__get_result()
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/_base.py", line 403, in __get_result
raise self._exception
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/concurrent/futures/thread.py", line 58, in run
result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugins/hw_wallet/plugin.py", line 260, in get_password_for_storage_encryption
xpub = self.get_xpub(derivation, "standard")
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugin.py", line 523, in wrapper
return run_in_hwd_thread(partial(func, *args, **kwargs))
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugin.py", line 513, in run_in_hwd_thread
return func()
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugins/trezor/clientbase.py", line 150, in get_xpub
with self.run_flow(creating_wallet=creating):
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugins/trezor/clientbase.py", line 89, in __exit__
self.end_flow()
File "/home/user/wspace/electrum/electrum/plugins/trezor/clientbase.py", line 82, in end_flow
self.handler.finished()
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'finished'
```
Previously it was only the actual commands that directly or indirectly verified
the password. This adds a check that runs for any command requiring a password.
related https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/pull/9238
- fdroid maintainers asked that releases use fixed forks of p4a and buildozer,
so now we use the newly created forks in the spesmilo org. I plan to keep using
my existing contributor-specific repos for development, but whatever we push
to electrum master, should use the new spesmilo/ forks.
see https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/merge_requests/15858#note_2136345746
- Also, I added branch protection rules for branches named "electrum_*", so if
we name the branches that are actually used in releases as such, we won't
accidentally force-push them. (ref https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/8162)
I think we can just create a new branch whenever we would want to force-push
the existing one.
- also factored out some parameters so that it is easier to programmatically
access them from the fdroid build script.
see https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/merge_requests/15858#note_2136094409
Looks like upstream key file changed. Still the same crypto key, just updated expiration date.
```
$ sha256sum winehq_20*
78b185fabdb323971d13bd329fefc8038e08559aa51c4996de18db0639a51df6 *winehq_2019.key
d965d646defe94b3dfba6d5b4406900ac6c81065428bf9d9303ad7a72ee8d1b8 *winehq_2024.key
$ gpg winehq_2019.key
gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to guess what you mean ...
pub rsa3072 2018-12-10 [SC]
D43F640145369C51D786DDEA76F1A20FF987672F
uid WineHQ packages <wine-devel@winehq.org>
sub rsa3072 2018-12-10 [E] [expired: 2020-12-09]
$ gpg winehq_2024.key
gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to guess what you mean ...
pub rsa3072 2018-12-10 [SC]
D43F640145369C51D786DDEA76F1A20FF987672F
uid WineHQ packages <wine-devel@winehq.org>
sub rsa3072 2018-12-10 [E]
```
Co-authored-by: SomberNight <somber.night@protonmail.com>
Use our own logic to go from ELECTRUM_VERSION to numeric android versionCode,
instead of using the default conversion done by python-for-android.
Even before this, we were already patching p4a to modify their logic (see [0]).
This commit changes that logic again, and moves it into a separate script in our repo.
- calculation change is due to the f-droid maintainers asking for the
arch code to be in the least significant digits (instead of most sig digits) (see [1])
I have pushed and changed to a new p4a branch, which is just a copy of the previous one
with 3 commits related to versionCode calc squashed.
[0]: edb7e4fe6d
[1]: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/9210#issuecomment-2380559324
To comply with new google play store requirement:
> Starting August 31 2024:
> - New apps and app updates must target Android 14 (API level 34) or higher to be submitted to Google Play
AFAICS, we do not need to adapt to any of the changes.
https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14
I noticed that when running from source on macOS, the OS menubar has an "About Python" menu item,
instead of an "About Electrum" menu item. I tried to fix that by this, but actually it is not working :P
Nevertheless, this looks useful at least on Linux and Windows. E.g. when instantiating a new dialog
without an explicit title, the qt application name is used as default.
The application name, without this change AFAICS was already "Electrum" when running any of the binaries.
However when running from source, it was in some cases "python" or "run_electrum" or even "electrum-4"
(depending on OS and how the main script is started).
Now it is consistent -- except on macOS it still is not, as there it really wants to look for a .plist...
In some cases this makes it much easier to successfully scan a QR code.
I was trying to scan a PSBT using a laptop camera from my phone screen for 2 minutes, until I realised the screen brightness was the issue. o.O
- between the Back btn and the Next btn, the latter should have priority for focus
- but if the user needs to enter the wallet password, that textedit should have focus
closes https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/9157
related c6802adbae
The history tab would show an incorrect feerate for partial/unsigned (local) txs,
if they had any p2sh/p2wsh txins. We would just guess the script is p2wpkh, and
use that for the size calc. Now with calling add_info_from_wallet, the correct
size is used to calculate the feerate.
(The gui tx dialogs call add_info_from_wallet independently, so the size/feerate
shown there were already correct.)
