AaronFiore/electrum
1
0
Fork 0
Code Activity

Merge pull request #7663 from git-sgmoore/patch-1

Browse Source 
Minor grammar fixes
This commit is contained in:
ThomasV
2022-02-16 16:40:27 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3e486b029c a84eab964c
commit fa31e8ae25
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
electrum/wallet.py
View File

@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ class Abstract_Wallet(AddressSynchronizer, ABC):
# Given as the user is spending "max", and so might be abandoning the wallet,
# try to include all UTXOs, otherwise leftover might remain in the UTXO set
# forever. see #5433
# note: Actually it might be the case that not all UTXOs from the wallet are
# note: Actually, it might be the case that not all UTXOs from the wallet are
# being spent if the user manually selected UTXOs.
sendable = sum(map(lambda c: c.value_sats(), coins))
for (_,i) in i_max:
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ class Abstract_Wallet(AddressSynchronizer, ABC):
The idea here is that an attacker might send us a UTXO in a
large low-fee unconfirmed tx that will ~never confirm. If we
spend it as part of a tx ourselves, that too will not confirm
(unless we use a high fee but that might not be worth it for
(unless we use a high fee, but that might not be worth it for
a small value UTXO).
In particular, this test triggers for large "dusting transactions"
that are used for advertising purposes by some entities.