choosing accounts: updates
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
|||||||
% Choosing accounts
|
% Choosing accounts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some rules of thumb:
|
Your chart of accounts is an important factor in the success of your accounting system.
|
||||||
|
Here are some rules of thumb when choosing account names:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- You don't need to try to pick the perfect set of accounts at the start.
|
- You don't need to try to pick the perfect set of accounts at the start.
|
||||||
They can always be changed later with search and replace.
|
This is plain text accounting - account names can always be changed later with search and replace.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Your chart of accounts is an important factor in the success of your accounting system.
|
- Expect your chart of accounts to change, as your accounting know-how and accounting needs do.
|
||||||
Expect it to change, as your accounting know-how and accounting needs do.
|
|
||||||
It's worth investing time to review and improve it periodically.
|
It's worth investing time to review and improve it periodically.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- If you are required to use some legally mandated chart of accounts, start with that.
|
- If you are required to use some legally mandated chart of accounts, start with that.
|
||||||
@@ -42,9 +42,10 @@ Some rules of thumb:
|
|||||||
Spaced names look nice to humans, but tend to cause headaches in command lines and scripts, requiring extra work.
|
Spaced names look nice to humans, but tend to cause headaches in command lines and scripts, requiring extra work.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- For categorising, should you use accounts, tags, descriptions, or other fields?
|
- For categorising, should you use accounts, tags, descriptions, or other fields?
|
||||||
Use accounts for your primary categorising as they are best supported.
|
Use accounts primarily, as they are the best supported.
|
||||||
Consider using tags if you have cross-cutting categorising schemes.
|
For adhoc/infrequent categorising, some matchable text in the description can be enough.
|
||||||
For adhoc/infrequent categorising, some matchable text in the description might be enough.
|
If you have cross-cutting categorising schemes, tags can be handy.
|
||||||
|
More on this [in the FAQ](https://plaintextaccounting.org/FAQ#should-i-categorise-with-account-payee-description-tags...).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Beancount account names are more restrictive than hledger's/Ledger's.
|
- Beancount account names are more restrictive than hledger's/Ledger's.
|
||||||
If you might be exporting to Beancount in future (say, to use the Fava web UI),
|
If you might be exporting to Beancount in future (say, to use the Fava web UI),
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user